Participation and non-participation

These notes are part of a series for the book.

Wenger, E. (1998) ‘Ch. 7, Participation and non-participation’, in Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

Outline

  1. Identities of non-participation
  2. Sources of participation and non-participation
  3. Institutional non-participation
    1. Non-participation as institutional relation
    2. Non-participation as practice

Notes

‘Learning is a matter of social energy and power’ (from the 13 principles defining learning, Wenger, 1998, p. 227).

Our identity is made of what we are and what we are not. We can’t participate in every COP. There are four ways to define participation:

Participation and non-participation involve social relations:

A company can mediate boundaries and non-participation with things like status and salary, and by standardizing work with reifications and not encouraging initiative. These things result in marginalization, and the marginalization can become a characteristic of the COP, affecting members as they try to rectify it with their identity — and to do so, they turn non-participation into a:

The modes of belonging (engagement, imagination, and alignment) give a community a way to have participation and non-participation, to support learning.